Repository logo
 
Publication

Observational and comparative study between automatic and manual analysis of sleep studies

2021-10Conference object Open access
Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorSão João, Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorCardoso, Andreia
dc.contributor.authorDomingues, Tiago Dias
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Vânia
dc.contributor.authorFradinho, Marta
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Laura
dc.contributor.authorFeliciano, Amélia
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-20T09:32:18Z
dc.date.available2021-10-20T09:32:18Z
dc.date.issued2021-10
dc.description.abstractObstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is a sleep-disordered breathing disorder. It consists of a set of symptoms and signs that result from recurrent episodes of intermittent upper airway obstruction. It is estimated that this syndrome is very common; however, its true prevalence is unknown, as it is underdiagnosed. OSAS is considered a systemic disease with several associated consequences, including cardiovascular and metabolic diseases, making it a public health problem. Polysomnography is the sleep study of choice for the diagnosis of OSAS, but the fact that it is a time-consuming test contributes to the underdiagnosis of this pathology. For this reason, one can opt for the Cardiorespiratory Sleep Study which, despite being a simpler test, allows for the diagnosis of this syndrome. The manual reading of these tests is one of the aspects that most contributes to their slowness, as well as the inter-observer variability in their reading. From a simplistic perspective, some studies have focused on the automatic analysis of these exams. However, there have been discrepancies between the two analyses, which can be significant in terms of final diagnosis and consequent therapeutic orientation. The Sleep Unit of the Hospital da Luz Setúbal, based on a sample of 3297 scans performed in 2011-2019, concluded that the automatic analysis may lead to an incorrect diagnosis of OSAS as well as its severity, being important that the diagnosis of this pathology be based on a manual analysis.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationSão João, R., Cardoso, A. , Domingues, T. D., Silva, V., Fradinho, M., Santos, L. & Feliciano, A.(Outubro, 2021). Observational and comparative study between automatic and manual analysis of sleep studies. XXV Congresso da Sociedade Portuguesa de Estatística, Evorapt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.15/3664
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://www.spe2021.uevora.pt/pt_PT
dc.subjectAutomatic analysispt_PT
dc.subjectDiagnosispt_PT
dc.subjectManual analysispt_PT
dc.subjectOSASpt_PT
dc.titleObservational and comparative study between automatic and manual analysis of sleep studiespt_PT
dc.typeconference object
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.conferencePlaceEvorapt_PT
oaire.citation.titleSPE 2021—XXV Congresso da Sociedade Portuguesa de Estatísticapt_PT
person.familyNameSão João
person.givenNameRicardo
person.identifier.ciencia-id8E1B-AFBF-E940
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3137-0891
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typeconferenceObjectpt_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublication7501922f-cbe1-4a1b-8bd6-21c777f269e2
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery7501922f-cbe1-4a1b-8bd6-21c777f269e2

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ApresentacaoSPE2021_RicardoSaoJoao.pdf
Size:
364.06 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Publicações de eventos científicos_ESGTS