Repository logo
 
Publication

Concurrent validity and reliability of global positioning systems for measuring intense running and peak speed performance: a systematic review

2025Review article Open access
Simple item page
datacite.subject.fosCiências Médicas::Ciências da Saúde
dc.contributor.authorHadi Nobari
dc.contributor.authorAlexandre Duarte Martins
dc.contributor.authorJoão Paulo Brito
dc.contributor.authorElena Mainer-Pardos
dc.contributor.authorPablo Valdés-Badilla
dc.contributor.authorRafael Oliveira
dc.contributor.editorRafael
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-22T00:01:49Z
dc.date.available2025-03-22T00:01:49Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractThe current systematic review aimed to analyse studies on the concurrent validity and reliability of microelectromechanical devices for measuring intense running and peak speed performance. A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, using EBSCO, PubMed, Scielo, Scopus, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science. Keywords and synonyms were entered in various combinations in the title, abstract, or keywords: (“Global positioning system” OR “Global Navigation Satellite System” OR “GPS”) AND (Validity OR Accuracy OR Reliability OR Precision OR Repeatability OR Reproducibility OR Consistency) AND (“sprint” OR “peak speed” “top seed” OR “maximal speed”). The risk of bias was assessed using the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies. From 839 studies, 20 were systematically analysed. It was found that 16 global positioning system (GPS) models were considered valid and 12 were considered reliable for measuring intense running and/or peak speed performance. Intense running performance in GPS with lower sampling rate (e.g. ≤ 5 Hz) acquisition demonstrated reduced validity and reliability in nonlinear movement patterns as well as movement intensity increases. Some limitations of the evidence, including the conditions associated with exercise testing and the benchmark and device used, varied between studies. In addition, the data of the algorithms used by GPS can affect the interpretation of the results. Thus it would be advisable to use higher sampling rates.eng
dc.identifier.citationNobari, H., Martins, A.D., Brito, J.P. Mainer-Pardos, E., Valdés-Badilla, P., Oliveira, R. (2025). Concurrent validity and reliability of global positioning systems for measuring intense running and peak speed performance: a systematic review. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-025-01023-2
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-025-01023-2
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.15/5741
dc.language.isoeng
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectAccuracy
dc.subjecthigh-speed
dc.subjectsensors
dc.subjectsports
dc.subjectsprint
dc.titleConcurrent validity and reliability of global positioning systems for measuring intense running and peak speed performance: a systematic revieweng
dc.typereview article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.titleGerman Journal of Exercise and Sport Research
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2025_Nobari_Oliveira_RS peak speed_sprtint_s12662-025-01023-2.pdf
Size:
625.37 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
4.03 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Artigos em revistas internacionais - ESDRM